Showing posts with label Christopher Hitchens. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Christopher Hitchens. Show all posts

Thursday, July 3, 2008

Video: On the Waterboard: Politics & Power: vanityfair.com

Video: On the Waterboard: Politics & Power: vanityfair.com:

"How does it feel to be “aggressively interrogated”? Christopher Hitchens found
out for himself, submitting to a brutal waterboarding session"


This is really good, click the link to see the video. Though it has been suggested that if it were really torture, he wouldn't have done it just to write a story about it. I don't think our standards should be that low in how we treat suspected terrorists.

Noted, this was done in a controlled environment, with people he knew and trusted near by. It was not done in by an enemy far from any form of safety or trust.

Friday, September 14, 2007

Wiping The Floor With Tariq Ramadan

Advice Goddess Blog: Wiping The Floor With Tariq Ramadan

"Finally, here's the audio of Hitchens crashing Tariq Ramadan's session at
Festivaletteratura in Mantua (after Ramadan wriggled out of debating Hitchens,
probably knowing Hitchens would make quick work of his po-mo bullshit claims
about the kumbaya-ness of Islam)."


I love hearing Hitchens take on people. I don't always agree but he is smart and knows how to ask good questions. Click the link for the site with the audio link.

Sunday, August 26, 2007

Hitchens: 13 reasons why Bush’s Vietnam analogy is moronic

Hitchens: 13 reasons why Bush’s Vietnam analogy is moronic

1) The Vietminh, later the Vietnamese NLF, were allies of the United States and Britain against the Axis during the Second World War. The Iraqi Baath party was on the other side.
2) Ho Chi Minh quoted Thomas Jefferson in proclaiming Vietnam's own declaration of independence, a note that has hardly been struck in Baathist or jihadist propaganda.
3) Vietnam was resisting French colonialism and had defeated it by 1954 at Dien Bien Phu; the real 'war' was therefore over before the US even landed troops in the country.
4) The subsequent conflict was fought to preserve an imposed partition of a country striving to reunify itself; if anything, the Iraqi case is the reverse.
5) The Vietnamese leadership appealed to the UN: the Saddamists and their jihadist allies murdered the first UN envoy to arrive in Iraq, saying that he was fit only for death because he had assisted in securing the independence of East Timor from Indonesia.
6) Vietnam never threatened any other country; Iraq under Saddam invaded two of its neighbours and declared one of them (Kuwait) to be part of Iraq itself.
7) Vietnam was a victim of chemical and ecological warfare; Iraq was the perpetrator of such illegal methods and sought to develop even worse nuclear and biological ones.
8) Vietnam neither sponsored nor encouraged terrorist tactics beyond its borders; Iraq under Saddam was a haven for Abu Nidal and other random killers and its 'insurgents' now proclaim war on Hindus, Jews, unbelievers and the wrong sort of Muslim.
9) There has for years been a 'people's war' fought by genuine guerrillas in Iraq; it is the war of liberation conducted by Kurdish fighters against genocide and dictatorship. Inconveniently for all analogies, these fighters are ranged on the side of the US and Britain.
10) The Iraqi Communist party and the Iraqi labour movement advocated the overthrow of Saddam (if not necessarily by Bush), a rather conspicuous difference from the situation in Indochina. These forces still form a part of the tenuous civil society that is fighting to defend itself against the parties of God.
11) The American-sponsored regimes in Vietnam tended, among other things, to be strongly identified with one confessional minority (Catholic) to the exclusion of secular, nationalist and Buddhist forces. The elected government in Iraq may have a sectarian hue, but at least it draws upon hitherto repressed majority populations - Kurds and Shias - and at least the American embassy works as a solvent upon religious and ethnic divisions rather than an inciter of them.
12) President Eisenhower admitted that if there had ever been a fair election in Vietnam, it would have been won by Ho Chi Minh; the Baath party's successors refused to participate in the Iraqi elections and their jihadist allies declared that democracy was an alien concept and threatened all voters with murder.
13) The Americans in Vietnam employed methods ('search and destroy'; 'body count') and weapons (napalm, Agent Orange) that targeted civilians. Today, those who make indiscriminate war on the innocent show their hand on the streets of Baghdad and are often the proxies of neighbouring dictatorships or of international gangster organisations.

SOURCE

Facebook

Dante Rose Pleiades's Facebook profile