Showing posts with label Newt Gingrich. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Newt Gingrich. Show all posts

Friday, September 28, 2007

Newt is Running

Townhall.com::Blog:Newt is Running

"Newt would need only 14,000 of his fans to flood the site with $2,300
'pledges' in order to declare a broad public groundswell for his candidacy.
Sound far-fetched? You've seen what Ron Paul supporters do. You think Newt fans
wouldn't do the same if they believed his entry into the race depended on it?
And if Newt's people actually left the system this open -- i.e. didn't require
you to leave a credit card that could then be charged -- I guarantee this hack
would spread like wildfire on the blogs the minute the site went up. "


I don't dislike Newt anymore than I dislike the rest of the Republican field, and only slightly better than I dislike the Democrats. However, do we really need yet another person in this race. Before he joins, he should ask himself what the voters are going to ask. What is he bringing to the table that the other candidates don't have.

Sunday, September 16, 2007

Gingrich calls Petraeus's report "wholly inadequate", eyes campaign - AMERICAblog: A great nation deserves the truth

Gingrich calls Petraeus's report "wholly inadequate", eyes campaign - AMERICAblog: A great nation deserves the truth:

" I think Newt is exactly what the GOP needs in this presidential campaign. It's
just not crazy enough or far-right enough nor has it properly alienated enough
people so it's about time they find a serious divider who can push the party
over the edge and into a ravine. With all of the leading candidates doing their
best to talk about the successful war in Iraq, Gingrich would spice up the
debates with his criticism, dividing the party faithful even more."


What, he is still talking about the fact that he might run, common Newt, even Fred is in the race already. Its time to fish or cut bait as they like to say. He can't win, but he could have an effect on the politics of the rest of the race if he did enter.

Friday, September 14, 2007

Daily Kos: Things that make you go "huh??????"

Daily Kos: Things that make you go "huh??????":

"But Gingrich, who represented Georgia for 20 years, indicated that a push
he is making for a grass-roots change in how the country is governed, with less
partisanship, would take at least five years to develop into a coherent
alternative to the current system."


Gingrich does not seem like the ideal person to be talking about bi-partisanship.

Wednesday, August 15, 2007

Crooks and Liars » Gingrich sees immigrants as ‘more deadly’ than terrorists:

Crooks and Liars » Gingrich sees immigrants as ‘more deadly’ than terrorists:

"Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich said Tuesday he is “sickened” that President
Bush and Congress went on vacation “while young Americans in our cities are
massacred” by illegal immigrants. […] Gingrich said that the “war here at home”
against illegal immigrants is “even more deadly than the war in Iraq and
Afghanistan.” “The federal government’s incompetence, timidity and uncoordinated
efforts to identify and deport criminal illegal aliens have had devastating
consequences for innocent Americans,” Gingrich said, in a newsletter"

I think we can stop talking about Gingrich running for office, I think in this climate just talking about immigration is the fastest way to kill your chances of getting elected. One because the issue is so clear cut and there seems to be so little ground on the issue. That means that what ever statement you are making is offending either one side or the other - and often both. This statement is an example of one that is going to upset a lot of people.

Saturday, August 4, 2007

Gingrich says Bush's war on terror is "phony" - AMERICAblog: A great nation deserves the truth

Gingrich says Bush's war on terror is "phony" - AMERICAblog: A great nation deserves the truth:

"Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich said Thursday the Bush administration is waging a 'phony war' on terrorism, warning that the country is losing ground against the kind of Islamic radicals who attacked the country on Sept. 11, 2001.

A more effective approach, said Gingrich, would begin with a national energy strategy aimed at weaning the country from its reliance on imported oil and some of the regimes that petro-dollars support.

'None of you should believe we are winning this war. There is no evidence that we are winning this war,' the ex-Georgian told a group of about 300 students attending a conference for collegiate conservatives...."


Is it just me or is this someone who sounds like they are running for president?

Thursday, August 2, 2007

Right Wing Watch: Gingrich Not Ready to Cede Spoiler Spot

Right Wing Watch: Gingrich Not Ready to Cede Spoiler Spot:

"Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, whose background makes him unlikely to gain
widespread support, has spent months hinting that he may enter the race if no suitable candidates emerge, all the while attempting to build a kind of grassroots structure. He recently called the GOP’s crop of candidates a “pathetic” bunch of “pygmies.”
But the likelihood of a run by “Law & Order” star Fred Thompson, who also plans a late entry, has stolen much of Gingrich’s thunder. Thompson’s rising star 'would appear to shade some of the sunlight' from Gingrich, as Grover Norquist of Americans for Tax Reform put it. "


Here is my prediction, I don't think either one of them is going to actually join the race, what they are doing is using the potential of joining the race as a way of keeping their faces and names in the news. At the same time they are using it as a way of injecting their own ideas into the race, the other candidates have to address the issues that they are bringing up or risk losing support. It is a great idea really, you can't lose.

Friday, July 27, 2007

Newt flirts with Thompson - Jonathan Martin - Politico.com

Newt flirts with Thompson - Jonathan Martin - Politico.com:

"Newt Gingrich's long, slow striptease over whether he will seek the presidency
in 2008 looks like it might come to an unexpected conclusion: a date with Fred
Thompson. "


That would be an interesting ticket to watch, not to vote for, but to watch. It would be like the drunk girl at the bar that is more fun watching than taking home.

Monday, March 12, 2007

Trouble in the family

The recent news that Giuliani's children will not be supporting him in his run for the White House has some asking if this is a personal family issue or an issue that speaks to the character of Giuliani, as a candidate and a president. What does it say about a person, that those who are closest and it would be assumed know the most about you, don't think you would make a good president. Then again, can we determine that they are taking a stand against him as a president, as opposed to him as a father, or a person that they don't want in their life. Could it be that someone could be a bad father, and still be a good president. Defenders of Giuliani, are trying to claim just that when they argue that he is not running for president based on his record as a father, or as a husband, but as a leader. While I hate the thought of Giuliani winning, on these terms it makes sense to leave these matters out of the debate. When you talk about Hillary Clinton, everyone has a suggestion about how she should have handled her relationship with Bill. However, like Giuliani, it could be said that Clinton is running not as a wife, but as a leader, Newt Gingrich is running not as an ex-husband and father, but as a leader.
What do these actions say about them as people though, lets find out by watching how they lead. All of these candidates have a record that can be looked at to see how they have voted in the past, and how they would govern once in the White House. There are a couple good reasons to look at a voting history, over other factors.
The top most being that it is clear, it is not in debate, what the facts are in each case. If you look at how a candidate voted, or ruled in a given matter, the candidate can defend their actions, but they cannot deny them. In personal relationships were facts known to the public are far less available, this cannot be done. There are points that can be argued over what really happened because the public does not know what happened.
A second strong point is that, even when we do know the facts, how these facts are to be understood is not uniform. Everyone knows that Clinton stayed with her husband after the scandal, but many people look at this differently. While groups have come out against Clinton for her choice, other groups have come out in support of her choice.
I would argue in my last my last point that, if you believe that this reflects the kind of leader they will be, you should be able to find examples in their records. If they have been a person that should not be trusted with power, and they have had power, there should be examples of how that power was misused. If they are a person that is going to support ideas that you think are wrong for America, the history of support for those ideas is out there. Why guess about choices that might be made in the future when there are choices that have been made in the past that can be discussed.
While it may be true that passion and emotion win more hearts and minds than logic and reason, I would hope that as a nation aiming for the best system of government we could aim for the logic and sound. While you cannot make a choice like this without your heart, to give to stage over to those who would manipulate us with emotional charges is to give the country over to those who control our fears the most.

Friday, March 9, 2007

News Update

While this weekend is now the beginning of Day Light Savings time, some are asking if this is an exercise in uselessness. The idea in mind when DST was extended earlier in the year, was to conserve energy. If people have one more hour at night of light, it is said that they will use less energy on lights. Critics point out that while it is true that people will be using less energy at night by using lights, this is mostly offset by the use of lights in the morning, in which there will be one less hour of light. A study in Australia, where several states passed similar laws making DST earlier in the year, while some did not. The study looked at the energy used by two states, one that had not changed the DST and one that had, and it showed that there was no savings of energy by the state that had made the change.
A case involving a deaf suspect in South Dakota is raising questions about who can be put to death by the state. The defense is claiming that Daphne Wright, being deaf, does not have a fair chance to defend herself in the court room. The defense filed a motion, claiming that to put Wright to death would be cruel and unusual punishment. The jury is being selected for the trial, where Wright is being charged with abduction, murder and dismemberment. The victim of the alleged crimes is another deaf womyn, Darlene VanderGeisen, who the defendant believed was attempting to interfere in a relationship between the defendant and another womyn. National institutes for disabled people are making statements supporting equal treatment for disabled people everywhere, including in the court room. The prosecution saying, that there was not different laws and different standards for different people. Andrew Imparato, said that to give a defendant special consideration because of deafness implies that they are unaware of their actions and supports negative stereo types. The defense claims complicated legal terms are not present in sign language and that the operation of the court and the process of translation, which often takes longer than the spoken testimony, puts the defendant at a disadvantage in the court room.
"There were times when I was praying and when I felt I was doing things that were wrong. But I was still doing them," Newt Gingrich said during an interview with Focus on the Families James Dobson. "I look back on those as periods of weakness and periods that I'm not only not proud of, but I would deeply urge my children and grandchildren not to follow in my footsteps." This is the first time that Gingrich has talked about his affair, and could be a preparation for a presidential run in 2008. Gingrich goes on to admit that while he was leading a charge against then President Clinton, he was himself having an affair. While he may be making moves towards a presidential run, I find it hard to believe that he anything like a credible chance for office, among the conservatives that will be needed for the Republican nomination, or among the general population that is used to seeing him as a very polarizing figure.
A self-described pedophile has posted pictures of Barack Obama's two children on his web page, calling them an "angelic duo". Barack's presidential campaign has threatened to filed legal action against Lindsay Ashford, who rated the presidential candidates based on the cuteness of their underage children. A lawyer who has handled similar cases, has stated that there are free speech issues that are being overlooked here, and that the public has a right to make a statement about the candidates and their families. As a journalism student, I understand that a public figure such as Obama, gives up a lot of privacy by putting himself in the public eye. I question how this works when it is applied to members of his family, and most of all when it is applied to underage members of his family. Another lawyer adds that even pedophiles have a right to freedom of speech, as long as they do not cross a line, they should not be disturbed. An Example of crossing the line would be, suggesting that an action be taken towards the children, such as finding them or taking them.
The man who abducted Clay Moore from a bus stop last month has been arrested by authorities. Vicente Ignacio Beltran-Moreno, 22, had fled to his native land of Mexico, and agreed to return after several days of negotiations. Clay was grabbed on Feb 25th, waiting at a bus stop on his way to school. He was taken away in a red pick-up truck and tied up in the woods with duct tape about 20 miles away. The boy used a safety pin to free himself from the bounds of the tape and found his way out of the woods. Authorities believe that Clay was taken at random, and that Moreno hoped that he could get a ransom for him.
While Giuliani in his run for president is banking on the events of 9-11 and his actions in the days that follow, he is running up against what would be a key supporter. The Firefighters Union is opposing Giuliani based on actions that were taken after the attacks that the union believes were disrespectful of the firefighters that died that day. A few of those actions were the reduction of the number of workers at ground zero, and the "scoop and dump" clean up methods that were used to expedite the clean up of the site. A letter sent to the press, detailing the unions stand against Giuliani, also claims that he was more interested in the recovery of the gold and silver at ground zero, saying that the recovery operations at the site changed after those resources had been recovered. A copy of the letter can be found here.
Another important backer is evangelical may not be willing to support Giuliani either. One leader says that his divorce history makes it hard to support him as a candidate for president. While conservative might be able to support a candidate that has had a divorce, Giuliani has had three, but the nature of the divorces and marriages raises its own questions. Richard Land, noted that Giuliani's divorce from television personality Donna Hanover was like a divorce on steroids. The public embarrassment of Hanover is going to be a hard sell, even if you can set aside Giuliani's stand on pro-choice and pro-gun control. Giuliani had dated his third wife publicly while still being married to Hanover. While John McCain has been married twice, he has acknowledged his mistakes, and as a war hero has less to defend when it comes to character.
Gordon Dick, a 30-year-old web marketing specialist from England has sued a company for spam he claims to have received in his e-mail. The lawsuit, which he won in court resulted in winnings of $1,445 in damages and $1,190 in court costs. While most people just delete e-mail and go on their way, Dick compared the actions of spammers to someone throwing rocks through your window. He called it anti-social behavior and said that the company should not have been engaged in it. He claims that his address was taken from a form without his permission. The company sued defended their actions, saying that his e-mail address was taken by mistake, and that the e-mails that they were sending were not spam.
President Bush in response to calls for a pardon of Lewis "Scooter" Libby, has said that he will stay out of the case until it has run its legal course. This of course begs the question, by those of us who would oppose any pardon of Libby as a corruption of justice, if he will pardon Libby at some later time. Libby has been convicted in a case involving perjury and obstruction of justice, this relates to his involvement in the leaking of the under-cover CIA officer. Defense attorneys for Libby are seeking a new trial for Libby, stating that their number one goal is to see the charges against him removed. While pardons are the right of a president, recent presidents have used the right seldom and often at the end of their terms, President Clinton pardoned Marc Rich, and President Bush senior pardoned Caspar Weinberger. I doubt that any action would be taken by the president until the end of his term, when the fallout would be escapable for him. It would also be too late for voters to take revenge on the party in general. With the American populations short memory span, the next election cycle would be too distant for a pardon to have much of an impact.
Two bodies of decomposing toddlers have been found under a house in San Antonio. The two bodies were found in plastic bags late Tuesday by residents who were trying to locate the source of a foul odor. The had reportedly been smelling the odor for as long as two weeks. While the ages of the children are unknown, but police believe that they were between the ages of 6 months and 2 years old. Tina Vara, said that her sister had lived at the house with a boyfriend and a 5-month-old and a girl who was 1 1/2- year old girl. Family members said that they have had no contact with the womyn, Valerie Lopez since she has started living with her current boyfriend.

Facebook

Dante Rose Pleiades's Facebook profile