"This week every single Democrat candidate participated in a first ever
homosexual sponsored debate carried live on a homosexual television network.
...So far this political season we have had Frosty the Snowman asking questions
over YouTube and now the 'Gay Debates' to see just which candidate is willing to
grant the most favor to a lifestyle which historical Christianity calls sinful.
What's next? The Cross Dresser Debates? Or perhaps the NAMBLA (North American
Man/Boy Lovers Association) Debates? Or here's one for the ages -- The
Bestiality Debates. Not possible? That's what I thought about our leaders
attending a debate sponsored by homosexuals twenty years ago."
What are humyn beings? Are they creatures that form relationships as expressions of love and affection. Do they create societies to assist them in their pursuit of happiness. Is the natural state of humyns to be good, decent and driven by deep emotions. Or are they craven beings that form relationships as a form of control. Are societies the bound together to form systems to keep people from following their naturally vulgar pursuits. Is the natural state of man, to be bestial, deprived beings that are purely driven by selfish lust?
What am I getting at you might wonder? Well if you believe the first, then gay relationships are another form of the expression of love between two people. Such relationships are based on many things, but most of all respect. There can only be respect between two equal beings, thus children cannot have bonds of this nature with adults - straight or gay. If you believe the second, then you believe that marriage is the only thing that keeps the beast of humynity from self destruction, and destruction of society. Gay relationships are a breech in that protection, a reversion to the primal lust that you believe drives humynity.
I see people are being good, and any healthy respectful relationship between consenting adults to be an expression of love.
No comments:
Post a Comment